Ghanaians Debate Law That Allows Compensation for Broken Marriage Promises
Some Ghanaians have expressed mixed reactions to the revelation that a person who promises to marry a partner but subsequently fails to fulfil that promise could face legal action and be ordered to pay compensation.
The issue has sparked debate, with some members of the public supporting the law, while others question whether a failed promise of marriage should attract legal consequences.
Under Ghanaian law, a person who makes a promise to marry another and subsequently fails to honour that promise may be sued by the affected partner.
Private legal practitioner Lawyer Nii Tettey Tetteh explained that where a person is taken to court over a promise of marriage and the court is satisfied that the promise was made and subsequently broken, the court may order the person to compensate the affected partner.
Lawyer Nii Tettey Tetteh made the clarification while speaking to Adwumawura Yaw Nkrumah on the AYEHU Show.
According to him, the legal provision is intended to provide a remedy where a genuine promise of marriage has been made but is subsequently not honoured.
The development has, however, generated different reactions among members of the public.
Some believe the law is necessary because it could discourage people from making marriage promises they have no intention of fulfilling.
They argue that individuals should be held accountable when they make serious commitments that influence another person's decisions and expectations.
Others, however, disagree with the provision, questioning whether a failed relationship or decision not to marry should result in legal liability.
They contend that relationships can change over time and that compelling someone to compensate an ex-partner could create further complications in personal relationships.
Speaking to Hot FM reporter Ethel Nana Esi Amoah, members of the public shared their varying opinions on whether the law is appropriate.
While some welcomed the provision as a measure to prevent people from taking their partners for granted, others maintained that decisions surrounding marriage should remain matters of personal choice and mutual consent.
The debate has consequently renewed discussions about the balance between personal relationships, promises of marriage and the legal protection available to individuals who claim to have suffered loss after a marriage promise was broken.
Written By: Ethel Nana Esi Amoah
Click the link Puretvonline.com | WhatsApp Channel to join the WhatsApp channel
Contact/WhatsApp: +233243201960 or manuelnkansah33@gmail.com
