Cyber Security Authority is best suited under Communications Ministry – Sam George

Minister-designate for Communications, Digital Technology, and Innovation, Sam George, has pushed back against suggestions that the Cyber Security Authority (CSA) should fall under the Ministry of National Security rather than the Communications Ministry.

Speaking during his vetting before the Appointments Committee on January 30, 2025, the nominee argued that the best framework for the CSA is to remain under the Communications Ministry, ensuring a balanced approach to cybersecurity governance.

“If you move the Cyber Security Authority solely under the National Security Ministry, it assumes a fully militarised, weaponised tool.”

Sam George explained that cybersecurity has five key interfaces, four of which are civilian-orientated:
✅ Public Interface—Engaging citizens on cybersecurity awareness.
✅ International Interface—Collaborating with global partners.
✅ Industry Interface—Regulating professionals and private-sector stakeholders.
✅ Policy Formulation—Guiding legislation and government action.
✅ Security & Intelligence—The only component tied to national security.

He pointed out that moving the CSA under National Security could undermine the four civilian aspects of its work.

“Best-case examples in countries like India, Singapore, and Rwanda show that cybersecurity should remain under the Communications Ministry.”

Despite advocating for CSA to remain under Communications, Sam George assured Parliament that strong collaboration between the Communications Ministry and National Security would be a priority.

“We will build synergies to ensure effective coordination while preserving the broader civilian role of cybersecurity in Ghana.”

His stance reflects a broader commitment to maintaining a balanced and strategic cybersecurity framework, ensuring that both national security and civilian interests are well served.